The most profound implication of Dirac’s equation was that any relativistic description of a particle necessarily involves not just the wave function of a single particle, but multiple wave functions representing the potential for other particles.
“The first quantization in physics gave a field representation for all the possible states of a given particle, by treating the observable properties (such as position and momentum) as operators on a wave function. The “second quantization”, suggested by Dirac’s equation, then consists of treating this quantum wave function itself as an operator, giving a field representation of all the possible quantum fields. We might says that second quantization considers “the field of all fields”. It’s remarkable that general relativity (the other fundamental theory of physics developed in the early 20th century) also involves a consideration of the field of all fields, albeit in a completely different sense. In both cases this leads to non-linearities, and in both cases the theories are found to entail infinities – if we regard them as exact to all orders, rather than just low-energy “effective” field theories”.
The issues lie in the methods that are being used to describe the force functions, as these are inclusive of 6 orbital oscillatory functions, all gyroscopic inertial carriers of a higher wave function, a larger “gear” or torsion wave function.
According to the model set by Dirac, and many other who follow Einstein and the fundamental vortex structure induced by opposing scalar functions, which we seem to be calling a particle, or an electron…
These equations become lost on the average person.
We will need to speak Greek, Latin and higher level mathematics in order to even understand these as expressions….
Why?
These are simple force functions. Inertia based on us, moving.
Why is this so difficult to comprehend?
Here is why….Look at these explanations…
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath654/kmath654.htm
We can do so much better using electromagnetic induction mechanics.
We can understand gravitation and movement based on these very simple functions.
However this is being confused. Massively.
If you understand why, then you are way ahead of the game.
If you understand electricity, you can learn how to induce it, as all electricity can be induced from gravitation.
In fact, it is electrostatic functions that induce the polar back emf that is felt as a gravitational function.
This is electrostatics, something that we learn as children with balloons.
None of this is even complicated. It just needs to be explained correctly using the inertial parameters of F=MV squared.
This is E=MV6th/polarity= E=MV4th.
Half is the electromagnetic wave, and half is the BEMF wave function. The back emf…the torsion value is the equal and opposite force of the electrical wave.
The total energetic value is both functions combined.
The derivative value is based on 6 fields of movement. Six.
Not Three. P is potential. This is based on the total torsion value of all six oscillatory functions combined.
This is why we have a six field conversion in the poles of any spherical toroidal oscillator. This becomes the vacuum, the draw for these wave functions, and we can see a physical compression field form along the lines of refraction.
Nothing that I am discussing here is even remotely complicated. It is all based on friction. We make electricity with our feet as children.
What is complicated are the terms being used and the mathematics that has been designed to hide these force functions, to make them unreadable and unusable.
These functions can be explained and measured using electromagnetics and understanding how to refract and reuse a back-electromagnetic wave instead of allowing it to dissipate.
This involves an electromagnetic imbalance and this is called capacitance.
We can also induce this same function mechanically using levers.
We can increase this function by using an imbalanced wheel on a lever.
We can learn electromagnetics and torsion physics by understanding leveraged compression and do this much easier and much faster than studying complicated terms and expressions and functions written by people who could not build a toroidal induction circuit….
I would think that people would be following Nikola Tesla, and through his work, learn to follow the functions, and leave the people behind.
Electricity was not invented by people.
This is how all matter is formed, through converging scalar functions. Follow these functions, these magnetic waves, these torsion spinor scalar functions…
It is Inertia.
We can tap this, compress this and electrify this.
It is easier than it sounds.
