The Inverse Square is applied to physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. The fundamental cause for this can be understood as geometric dilution corresponding to point-source radiation into three-dimensional space.
Inverting a rectangle induces a sphere.
So, let’s apply this to physics.
The inverse square relationship between force and distance is expressed in the Coulomb’s law equation for electrostatic force.
Coulomb’s Law
The Coulomb/s Law Interactive allows learners to explore the force of attraction or repulsion between two charged objects. The quantity of charge on the objects can be varied by dragging a slider. And the objects can be dragged closer together or further apart. The distance between objects can be measured using a built-in measuring tool.
Okay.
So we have all of that…
Now how do we apply this information in a manner that is RELATIVELY simple?
We use an imbalanced wheel and a lever. That, is all.
In order to understand physics, we need to understand movement.
Inertia. Kinetics. Induction. Compression.
Electrogravitational propulsion dynamics.
Fancy words for taking your first step.
Movement, creates compression relative to the mass and the velocity of said object, field or force.
Thought is a compression field.Yes. It moves.
Or…it is stationary, as an electroSTATIC FUNCTION, while we continue on our path of exploration.
We are either on a moving bus, or we are watching moving buildings from a stationary standpoint.
Welcome to Quantum Physics…where nothing matters and no answers are given, found or taken. Quantum mechanics seems to be a failure to understand electricity, as this has been denounced as “spooky science”, as magnetism was referred to as MAGIC for several hundred years.
I prefer electromagnetism.
We can communicate using compression mathematics. IWe can discuss polar phase conjugation and the disambiguation of matter into “energy”, into the vortex based electro-mechanical torsion tensors that are relative to non-coupled hydrogen atoms. All mater is made from one material string connected into different articulations of inductive refraction.
This is what induces the polar bonds that form into matter.
I explain some of this here: www.vancouverislandormus.net/learn-more
So what is “Relativity”?
Perspective. It is simply a relative perspective to motion and the inertia maintained by mass in motion as a square of force reaction, however this not a solution. The solution lies in the correct description of this six phased torsion reaction, as we need to consider all of the inertial potential, not just a portion of it. We actually move in six fields of travel, not three.
A dimension is a plane of motion, a direction of travel and we move in six different directions, six fields simultaneously, and for some reason this inertial electrogravitational potential is being overlooked, or intentionally hidden.
Relativity is only relative to the observer from his or her point or perspective, and this is observed through motion…through movement.
Movement relative to another object or position, fixed or otherwise, as when we expand our view on any “fixed position”, we can see that it is not fixed, but moving in a different plane of motion, invisible to thew observer.
The relative movement of matter is always in relation to another fixed point in space-time, and there is no fixed point in time-space. It is all in motion.
The total energetic potential of matter is based on it’s total velocity, in every plane of motion or dimension of travel..
We are already moving at 186 000 miles per second…in relation to the electrostatic field that polar interferometry provides. I am not certain how physicists observe light moving, while ignoring the simple fact that we are moving, and light is stationary.
What I am certain of, is how to tap this inertia, simply through applying a leveraged oscillatory system, and gravity.
I am showing anyone who cares to listen, how to electrify our electrogravitational potential. I am showing this using the correct terms and the correct method s and by using the correct methods to explain these increases in force functions based on our inertia…a potential that has yet to be ascertained.
However the usable values are simplified through an understanding of kinetic inertia..something that we learn as babies while attempting to walk.
E-MC squared is not the relative formula for a unified usable methodology.
This is why it is still a theory, as the person who wrote this blasphemous equation was a patent thief and a liar.
He was also a “D” student in math, so do not let anyone tell you that you can’t be “an Einstein”.
Continue learning Dogma instead of force functions, and this is certainly what you will become.
E=MC squared is a regurgitation of the mathematical formula discussed and later patented in 1903, by Henri Poincare. This was in relation to reactions that were occurring through Doppler Refraction experiments, as the wave interferometry allowed for the inductive refraction of a scalar function, initiating the inductive electromagnetic reaction as a response the vacuum initiation that occurs through any electromagnetic reaction. This is based on our movement in 4 higher planes of motion.
The E square reaction, is based on the ELECTROMAGNETIC square of force compression that is relative to mass in movement, not “light speed”. Discussing light speed will take us back to the inductive reaction that induces it, as an electrostatic, or stationary reaction relative to our motion.
You see, light is an electroSTATIC function. Look up what this term STATIC actually means. It may surprise you that these terms are already well known, as are these reactions.
There has been a word game being played out here for over a thousand years. Anyone who told you that the Bible was the word of God, was also lying to you.
The Total Potential (TP) is based on Mass(m) times Velocity (V), to the sixth power, as we move in 6 directions, not 3.
We divide this by the polarity of the magnetic spinor refraction value, in BOTH polar oscillatory functions, both counter and clockwise. This equation looks like this:
TP=MV^6/2
This leaves us a total value of energetic potential as TP=MV^4
This is relative to both the electrical and the magnetic reactions.
E=MV squared is ELECTRICITY, not energy.
F=MV squared is the equivalent back emf wave function. We can discuss the electromotive value as inertia!
